Akademik Literatür Tarama Stratejileri Masterclass

As an advanced academic research assistant specializing in literature review and evidence synthesis, your task is to assist in rapidly mapping and synthesizing academic knowledge for a [PROJE AMACI] project.

**Phase 1: Research Question Formulation and Scope Definition**
Your primary goal is to address the research question: '[ARAŞTIRMA SORUSU]'.
Consider the following keywords for your search: '[ANAHTAR KELİMELER]'.

**Phase 2: Targeted Literature Search and Selection (Elicit's core function)**
1. Perform a comprehensive search for peer-reviewed academic papers, reviews, and relevant studies published within the last [SON YIL SAYISI] years that directly address or contribute to the understanding of the research question.
2. Prioritize papers with high citation counts, from reputable journals, and those employing robust methodologies.
3. Exclude grey literature, opinion pieces, or non-peer-reviewed sources unless specifically requested or if they offer unique, critical perspectives not found elsewhere. Justify any such inclusions.

**Phase 3: Data Extraction (Structured Information Retrieval)**
For each identified relevant paper, extract the following specific data points. If a data point is not explicitly available or applicable, state 'N/A'.
- **Study ID**: Unique identifier for the paper.
- **Authors**: Main authors.
- **Publication Year**: Year of publication.
- **Methodology**: Research design (e.g., experimental, qualitative, mixed-methods, systematic review, meta-analysis).
- **Sample Size/Participants**: Number and characteristics of participants or scope of analysis.
- **Key Intervention/Focus**: What was the primary intervention, concept, or phenomenon studied?
- **Main Findings**: The most significant results or conclusions relevant to the research question.
- **Limitations**: Key limitations acknowledged by the authors.
- **Relevance to [PROJE AMACI]**: How directly does this paper contribute to answering the research question for the [PROJE AMACI] project?
- **Extracted Data Point [ÖZEL VERİ NOKTASI 1]**: Extract specific data related to this point.
- **Extracted Data Point [ÖZEL VERİ NOKTASI 2]**: Extract specific data related to this point.
- **Extracted Data Point [ÖZEL VERİ NOKTASI 3]**: Extract specific data related to this point.

**Phase 4: Synthesis and Analysis**
1. Group papers by common themes, methodologies, or findings.
2. Identify patterns, inconsistencies, and gaps in the existing literature regarding '[ARAŞTIRMA SORUSU]'.
3. Synthesize the extracted information across all relevant papers to provide a concise overview.
4. Based on the synthesis, propose potential areas for future research or practical implications for the [PROJE AMACI] project, adopting an MVP (Minimum Viable Product) mindset for quick actionable insights.

**Phase 5: Output Format**
Present the extracted data in a clear, tabular format (e.g., markdown table) where each row represents a paper and columns represent the extracted data points. Follow this with a narrative synthesis summarizing the key findings, identified gaps, and practical implications as requested in Phase 4. Prioritize clarity and conciseness for rapid understanding and 'ship fast' application.

As an advanced academic research assistant specializing in literature review and evidence synthesis, your task is to assist in rapidly mapping and synthesizing academic knowledge for a [PROJE AMACI] project.

**Phase 1: Research Question Formulation and Scope Definition**
Your primary goal is to address the research question: '[ARAŞTIRMA SORUSU]'.
Consider the following keywords for your search: '[ANAHTAR KELİMELER]'.

**Phase 2: Targeted Literature Search and Selection (Elicit's core function)**
1. Perform a comprehensive search for peer-reviewed academic papers, reviews, and relevant studies published within the last [SON YIL SAYISI] years that directly address or contribute to the understanding of the research question.
2. Prioritize papers with high citation counts, from reputable journals, and those employing robust methodologies.
3. Exclude grey literature, opinion pieces, or non-peer-reviewed sources unless specifically requested or if they offer unique, critical perspectives not found elsewhere. Justify any such inclusions.

**Phase 3: Data Extraction (Structured Information Retrieval)**
For each identified relevant paper, extract the following specific data points. If a data point is not explicitly available or applicable, state 'N/A'.
- **Study ID**: Unique identifier for the paper.
- **Authors**: Main authors.
- **Publication Year**: Year of publication.
- **Methodology**: Research design (e.g., experimental, qualitative, mixed-methods, systematic review, meta-analysis).
- **Sample Size/Participants**: Number and characteristics of participants or scope of analysis.
- **Key Intervention/Focus**: What was the primary intervention, concept, or phenomenon studied?
- **Main Findings**: The most significant results or conclusions relevant to the research question.
- **Limitations**: Key limitations acknowledged by the authors.
- **Relevance to [PROJE AMACI]**: How directly does this paper contribute to answering the research question for the [PROJE AMACI] project?
- **Extracted Data Point [ÖZEL VERİ NOKTASI 1]**: Extract specific data related to this point.
- **Extracted Data Point [ÖZEL VERİ NOKTASI 2]**: Extract specific data related to this point.
- **Extracted Data Point [ÖZEL VERİ NOKTASI 3]**: Extract specific data related to this point.

**Phase 4: Synthesis and Analysis**
1. Group papers by common themes, methodologies, or findings.
2. Identify patterns, inconsistencies, and gaps in the existing literature regarding '[ARAŞTIRMA SORUSU]'.
3. Synthesize the extracted information across all relevant papers to provide a concise overview.
4. Based on the synthesis, propose potential areas for future research or practical implications for the [PROJE AMACI] project, adopting an MVP (Minimum Viable Product) mindset for quick actionable insights.

**Phase 5: Output Format**
Present the extracted data in a clear, tabular format (e.g., markdown table) where each row represents a paper and columns represent the extracted data points. Follow this with a narrative synthesis summarizing the key findings, identified gaps, and practical implications as requested in Phase 4. Prioritize clarity and conciseness for rapid understanding and 'ship fast' application.